As I mentioned in my last
post (#152), I have a great workspace purchased a half century ago from an Art
Deco mural painter. The only reason we could afford it was because it was (and
still is) a ‘handyman’s special’ and we were willing to be the handymen.
This brings me to a favorite
theory: “no artists’ space is ever big enough.” It’s like we can’t help
hungering for more room. Even though I love the studio in my house, the workspace
of my dreams is an abandoned early 20th century factory, an entire
floor with giant windows on either side, a large track down the middle that
would hold huge canvases and a performance space at the far end. I’d put a sofa
bed and a kitchenette near the door so I could live with my work, painting in
the middle of the night. Unfortunately, space like that doesn’t exist any more
– unless you are willing to move to Norwich, CT or an abandoned textile mill in
Rhode Island or the wilds of New Hampshire.
A few years ago, some friends
and I looked at a vacant c1920s hotel in Stamford that had been converted to
Class D office space nobody seemed to want. We thought we could pool our money,
buy it, remove the partitions and use it for loft living. It was a great idea;
I’d have Curley’s next door and could buy a meal plan. However, when we looked
at the spaces, we realized that most of the windows were blocked – or were
going to be blocked - by new fifteen story buildings. The one permanent view
was of Columbus Park – good – but not good enough. Pass.
Areas like Fairfield County
are particularly hard on artists. You only have to look at the tiny cubbies the
Loft Artists have settled for (and they’re not cheap): boxes, the size of a
guest room. This is especially galling when you remember that they started out
in a poor artists’ paradise, the ruins of the old Yale & Towne Lock Factory
in the South End of Stamford, Thirty unused buildings: low rent, no amenities,
unsafe after dark, unclean communal toilets down the hall, BUT with 15’
ceilings and huge industrial windows with great views on all sides. A
three-bedroom apartment in the now “restored” complex along Henry Street rents
for around $4,000 a month and is the size of my former $250 a month loft! You
can barely fit a bed and a dresser in the bedrooms. There’s still some
reasonably priced space to be had in Bridgeport or Port Chester or Norwalk but
you can’t legally live there and what are you going to do if you feel like
working in the middle of the night? Come down in your pajamas? Would you dare
even step out of your car?
A corollary to my “no artists
space is ever big enough” theory is my observation that “the size of artwork
expands to fill all available space.” Small studio = Small work. BIG studio:
the sky’s the limit. It’s not just the size of the walls, but you need room to
step back to look at what you are doing.
What set me off on this topic
is my current situation. You won’t believe me, but I feel as if I’m outgrowing
my present studio! I now crave a space where I can paint 20’ canvases or do
theatrical performances with my cutouts on the overhead projector. Plus, given
the current political scene, I’d like to take my “Developer” series out of the
attic: a dozen giant cardboard cutouts based on the gross moguls I dealt with
over the years (surrounded by wives, ex-wives, offspring, lawyers, land use
consultants, accountants, politicians and thugs.) Wait ‘til you see how
prescient I was! They are begging to tell their story!
I’m currently reading a book called “INVENTING DOWNTOWN: Artist-Run Galleries in
New York City 1952-1965”. It’s the catalogue for a show held last year at
the Grey Gallery at NYU. I even broke down and bought it ($60), something I
rarely do since I have hundreds of art books I haven’t gotten around to yet.
It’s about a period in New York, the fifties and sixties, when groups of
struggling artists working in places like the Lower East Side banded together
to open co-op galleries in tenement apartments and empty storefronts. Many of them
later became rich and famous but got their start there. I was busy changing
diapers at the time and missed the scene (no regrets, however.) On several
occasions though, I did manage to get to visit shows where artists I knew from
student days exhibited. When the book describes where and how they lived and
worked, you will better understand how critical Cheap Space is to creative
growth.
Ah yes. I remember Yale & Towne. It was great space. A failure of modern urban planners and architects is that they have not been successful in creating affordable artists spaces as described by Renee. It rally is something missing from the modern American City. I wonder if any foundations out there support this type of work??? Something to investigate. Cheers, tomV.
ReplyDelete